Geographic Book

Made with ❤️️ on 🌍

GIS‑based flood risk assessment using multi‑criteria decision analysis of Shebelle River Basin in southern Somalia

Article Highlights
• GIS-based analysis identified flood hazard, vulnerability
and risk zones in the Shebelle River Basin, Somalia.
• Majority of the basin falls in very low to moderate risk
ranges, with small areas at high and very high risk.
• Flood hazard, vulnerability and risk maps can guide flood protection efforts and raise awareness among
local populations

Article Highlights
• GIS-based analysis identified flood hazard, vulnerability
and risk zones in the Shebelle River Basin, Somalia.
• Majority of the basin falls in very low to moderate risk
ranges, with small areas at high and very high risk.
• Flood hazard, vulnerability and risk maps can guide
f
lood protection efforts and raise awareness among
local populations.

Flood risk management relies heavily on predict
ing the size of river floods. There are three common
approaches to flood prediction: (i) monitoring storm
progress (e.g., quantity of rainfall) can be used to fore
cast short-term flood events; (ii) assessing the frequency
of flooding through statistical analyses allows determin
ing the recurrence interval for any year and for a given
discharge in the stream (without explicitly characteriz
ing the flood area); and (iii) evaluating the frequency of
flooding through statistical analyses allows determining
the recurrence interval for any year and for a given dis
charge in the stream without explicitly

Flood inventory map
The preparation of a flood inventory map is necessary for
the accurate assessment of flood susceptibility zonation.
The flood inventory map of the study area was generated

Fig. 1 Geographical location
for Shebelle River Basin in
Somalia a Somalia and b Part
of Shebelle River Basin
from FAO website
Data acquiring and preparation of thematic
maps
Defining a clear and efficient methodology is vital for the
quality of the findings of the study. The various input data
were required to achieve the aim of this research and to
have accurate results, Table 1 shows data used and their
sources. In this study, secondary research data sources
were used and collected

Flood hazard parameters (FHP)


The extent of flooding is influenced by a variety of factors
including the physical features of the topography, rain
fall, geology, drainage systems and soil texture. Through
literature review and field investigation, we have consid
ered only 7 most important parameters that contribute
to flooding.
Fig. 2 Methodological flow
chart of the study
2.4.1.1 Elevation Lowland locations are more vulnerable
to flooding as water moves from higher to lower eleva
tions [33]. The elevation map is made possible by reclas
sifying the DEM. The Shebelle River catchment’s topo
graphic elevation ranges from 3 to 2821 m. The upstream
elevation is extremely high, whereas the downstream
level is extremely low. As a result of the high elevation and
steep slope upstream, there is considerable runoff after
heavy rains, causing high floods downstream. As a result,
the land slope is flat, and the river course allows overflow.
A Digital Elevation Model (DEM) specifies the eleva
tion of any point in a particular area at a specific spatial

Flood hazard mappin

Analysing of flood influencing factors
for creating flood vulnerability mapping

Flood vulnerability mapping

Flood risk mapping
The final result of the present study is the flood risk zona
tion (FRZ) map, which is a combination of the flood haz
ard zone (FHZ) map and the flood vulnerability zone (FVZ)
map. The risk of flooding is depicted on a map that shows
five levels of risk, ranging from very low to very high
(Fig. 7c). The final flood risk map created using the AHP
GIS technique comprised 5.7% and 12.13% areas classified
as very high and high flood risk, 23.65% areas classified as
medium flood risk, and 30.88% and 27.64% areas classified
as low and very low flood risk. Most of the high and very
high flood risk zone falls in the coastal areas, especially in
Jilib, Baraawe, Marka and Wanlaweyne districts.


3.6 Validation of the model
The study quantitatively verified the AHP output with the
flood inventory map through ROC-AUC. The ROC-AUC
has been performed by comparing the FHZ map with 59
f
lood points employing the ‘ArcSDM’ tool in the ArcGIS
software.

Conclusions


The objective of this study was to prepare flood hazard, vul
nerability, and risk maps in a specific part of the Shebelle
River Basin of Somalia by analyzing flood-triggering factors
using the GIS-based AHP technique. By using Arc GIS soft
ware, the following flood-generating parameters were cre
ated during the development of flood hazard, vulnerability
and risk map; Elevation, Slope, Soil, Geology, Distance to
river, Rainfall, Drainage density, Land use/Land cover, Popu
lation density, Distance to road, GMIS and HBASE maps.

References

  1. Referonce:
  2. Shuayb Abdinour Osman1 · Jayanta Das2
  3. Received: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 4 April 2023
  4. © The Author(s) 2023 (PDF)
  5. Yahaya S, Ahmad N, Abdalla RF (2010) Multicriteria analysis
    for flood vulnerable areas in Hadejia-Jama’are River basin,
    Nigeria. Eur J Sci Res 42(1):71–83
  6. Das J, Bhattacharya SK (2023) Monitoring and managing
    multi-hazards: a Multidisciplinary Approach. Springer, Cham.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15377-8
  7. Salman AB, Howari FM, El-Sankary MM, Wali AM, Saleh MM
    (2010) Environmental impact and natural hazards on Kharga
    Oasis monumental sites, western Desert of Egypt. J Afr Earth
    Sc 58(2):341–353. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jafre arsci. 2010. 03.
    011
  8. Taylor J, man Lai K, Davies M, Clifton D, Ridley I, Biddulph P
    (2011) Flood management: prediction of microbial contami
    nation in large-scale floods in urban environments. Environ Int
    37(5):1019–1029. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envint. 2011. 03. 015
  9. Foudi S, Osés-Eraso N, Tamayo I (2015) Integrated spatial flood
    risk assessment: the case of Zaragoza. Land Use Policy 42:278
  10. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.002
  11. Anees MT, Abdullah K, Nawawi MNM, Ab Rahman NNN, Piah
    ARM, Zakaria NA, Omar AM (2016) Numerical modeling tech
    niques for flood analysis. J Afr Earth Sc 124:478–486. https://
    doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.10.001
  12. El Fels AEA, Alaa N, Bachnou A, Rachidi S (2018) Flood fre
    quency analysis and generation of flood hazard indicator
    maps in a semi-arid environment, case of Ourika watershed
    (western high Atlas, Morocco). J Afr Earth Sc 141:94–106.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.02.004
  13. Zereini F (2008) In: Hötzl H (ed) Climatic changes and water
    resources in the Middle East and North Africa. Springer, Berlin.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85047-2
  14. Chen H, Ito Y, Sawamukai M, Tokunaga T (2015) Flood hazard
    assessment in the Kujukuri Plain of Chiba Prefecture, Japan,
    based on GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Nat Hazards
    78(1):105–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1699-5
  15. Eguaroje O, Alaga T, Ogbole J, Omolere S, Alwadood J, Kola
    wole I, Ajileye OO (2015) Flood vulnerability assessment of
    Ibadan city, Oyo state. Nigeria World Environ 5(4):149–159
  16. Mitra R, Saha P, Das J (2022) Assessment of the performance
    of GIS-based analytical hierarchical process (AHP) approach
    for flood modelling in Uttar Dinajpur district of West Bengal,
    India. Geomatics. Nat Hazards Risk 13(1):2183–2226. https://
    doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2112094
  17. Liu C, Guo L, Ye L, Zhang S, Zhao Y, Song T (2018) A
    review of advances in China’s flash flood early-warning
    system. Nat Hazards 92(2):619–634. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/
    s11069-018-3173-7
  18. Lund JR (2012) Flood management in California. Water
    4(1):157–169. https://doi.org/10.3390/w4010157
  19. Shafapour Tehrany M, Kumar L, Neamah Jebur M, Shabani
    F (2019) Evaluating the application of the statistical index
    method in flood susceptibility mapping and its comparison
    with frequency ratio and logistic regression methods. Geo
    matics Nat Hazards Risk 10(1):79–101. https:// doi. org/ 10.
    1080/19475705.2018.1506509
  20. OCHA (2019) Humanitarian impact of flooding.Humanitarian, 5
  21. Parvez A, Meutia R, Hussein M, Garane GK, Riddell H (2020)
    Somalia-2019 Floods Impact and Needs Assessment. https://
    policycommons.net/artifacts/1262989/somalia/1836950/
  22. Ahmed MA, Mohamed MH, Parvin MM, Ilić P (2022) The recur
    rence of natural disasters in Jowhar, Middle Shabelle Region,
    Somalia: the Causes and Impacts. J Environ Prot 13(9):657
  23. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2022.139042
  24. Billi P, Sebhat MY (2022) River Hydromorphology and Flood
    Hazard in Somalia. Landscapes and landforms of the Horn of
    Africa: Eritrea, Djibouti, Somalia. Springer, Cham, pp 281–311.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05487-7_13
  25. Bradbury M, Coultan V (1998) Somalia inter-agency flood
    response operation-Phase 1; November-December 1997. Soma
    lia inter-agency flood response operation. https:// agris. fao. org/
    agris-search/search.do?recordID=SO2005100083
  26. Li CJ, Chai YQ, Yang LS, Li HR (2016) Spatio-temporal distri
    bution of flood disasters and analysis of influencing factors
    in Africa. Nat Hazards 82:721–731. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/
    s11069-016-2181-8
  27. ReliefWeb (2019) Somalia floods update (31 october 2019),
    2021-08-01. https:// relie fweb. int/ report/ somal ia/ somal ia-
    f
    loods-update-31-october-2019
  28. Sadiq R, Akhtar Z, Imran M, Ofli F (2022) Integrating remote sens
    ing and social sensing for flood mapping. Remote Sens Appl:
    Soc Environ 25:100697. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. rsase. 2022.
    100697
  29. Pulvirenti L, Chini M, Pierdicca N (2020) InSAR multitemporal
    data over persistent scatterers to detect floodwater in urban
    areas: a case study in Beletweyne, Somalia. Remote Sens
    13(1):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010037
  30. Periyasamy P, Yagoub MM, Sudalaimuthu M (2018) Flood vul
    nerable zones in the rural blocks of Thiruvallur district, South
    India. Geoenviron Disasters 5:21. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/
    s40677-018-0113-5
  31. Deepak S, Rajan G, Jairaj PG (2020) Geospatial approach for
    assessment of vulnerability to flood in local self governments.
    Geoenviron Disasters 7(1):1–19. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/
    s40677-020-00172-w
  32. Lee G, Jun KS, Chung ES (2015) Group decision-making
    approach for flood vulnerability identification using the fuzzy
    VIKOR method. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 154:863–874. https://
    doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-863-2015
  33. Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a
    survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(7):703–726. https://
    doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661508
  34. Mohamed AE (2013) Managing shared basins in the Horn of
    Africa–Ethiopian projects on the Juba and Shabelle rivers and
    downstream effects in Somalia. Nat Resour Conserv 1(2):35–49.
    https://doi.org/10.13189/nrc.2013.010203
  35. Rincón D, Khan UT, Armenakis C (2018) Flood risk mapping using
    GIS and multi-criteria analysis: a greater Toronto area case study.
    Geosciences 8(8):275. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ geosc ience s8080
    275
    Vol:.(1234567890)
    SN Applied Sciences (2023) 5:134
    | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05360-5
    Research Article
  36. RIVER I (2006) Evaluating land use change effects on river flow
    using USGS geospatial stream flow model in Mara River basin,
    Kenya. Cent Remote Sens Land Surf 28:30
  37. Mohamed J, Ali DA, Warsame AA, Adam MB (2022) Two
    phases of long-term shift in extreme precipitation in Soma
    lia. Meteorol Atmos Phys 34(3):54. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/
    s00703-022-00896-4
  38. Houghton-Carr HA, Print CR, Fry MJ, Gadain H, Muchiri P (2011)
    An assessment of the surface water resources of the Juba
    Shabelle basin in southern Somalia. Hydrol Sci J 56(5):759–774.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.585470
  39. Patrikaki O, Kazakis N, Kougias I, Patsialis T, Theodossiou N, Vou
    douris K (2018) Assessing flood hazard at river basin scale with
    an index-based approach: the case of Mouriki, Greece. Geo
    sciences 8(2):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020050
  40. Jahn R, Blume HP, Asio VB, Spaargaren O, Schad P (2006) Guide
    lines for soil description. FAO
  41. Mitra R, Das J (2022) A comparative assessment of flood suscep
    tibility modelling of GIS-based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS tech
    niques in the sub-himalayan foothills region of Eastern India.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:16036–16067. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/
    s11356-022-23168-5
  42. Dash P, Sar J (2020) Identification and validation of poten
    tial flood hazard area using GIS-based multi‐criteria analysis
    and satellite data‐derived water index. J Flood Risk Manag
    13(3):e12620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12620
  43. Fernández DS, Lutz MA (2010) Urban flood hazard zoning in
    Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria deci
    sion analysis. Eng Geol 111(1–4):90–98. https:// doi. org/ 10.
    1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006
  44. He B, Xu YG, Huang XL, Luo ZY, Shi YR, Yang QJ, Yu SY (2007) Age
    and duration of the Emeishan flood volcanism, SW China: geo
    chemistry and SHRIMP zircon U–Pb dating of silicic ignimbrites,
    post-volcanic Xuanwei formation and clay tuff at the Chaotian
    section. Earth Planet Sci Lett 255(3–4):306–323. https:// doi. org/
    10.1016/j.epsl.2006.12.021
  45. Bonacci O, Ljubenkov I, Roje-Bonacci T (2006) Karst flash floods:
    an example from the Dinaric karst (Croatia). Nat Hazards Earth
    Syst Sci 6(2):195–203. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5194/ nhess-6- 195- 2006
  46. Çelik HE, Cigizoglu HK, Agiralioglu N, Coskun HG, Esin AI, Aydin
    A (2012) The analysis of 2004 flood on Kozdere Stream in
    Istanbul. Nat Hazards 63(2):461–477. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/
    s11069-012-0165-x
  47. Chakraborty S, Mukhopadhyay S (2019) Assessing flood risk
    using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical infor
    mation system (GIS): application in Coochbehar district of West
    Bengal, India. Natural hazards 99(1): 247–274. https:// doi. org/
    10.1007/s11069-012-0165-x
  48. Malinowski R, Groom G, Schwanghart W, Heckrath G (2015)
    Detection and delineation of localized flooding from World
    View-2 multispectral data. Remote Sens 7(11):14853–14875.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71114853
  49. Das J, Gayen A, Saha S, Bhattacharya SK (2017) Modelling of
    alternative crops suitability to tobacco based on Analytical hier
    archy process in Dinhata subdivision of Koch Bihar district, West
    Bengal. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(4):1571–1587. https:// doi.
    org/10.1007/s40808-017-0392-y
  50. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning. Priority
    setting. Resource Allocation. MacGraw-Hill, p 287
  51. Elkhrachy I (2015) Flash flood hazard mapping using satellite
    images and GIS tools: a case study of Najran City, Kingdom of
    Saudi Arabia (KSA). Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 18(2):261
  52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.06.007
  53. Kazakis N, Kougias I, Patsialis T (2015) Assessment of flood haz
    ard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and
    Analytical Hierarchy process: application in Rhodope–evros
    region. Greece Sci Total Environ 538:555–563. https:// doi. org/
    10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.055
  54. Rahmati O, Zeinivand H, Besharat M (2016) Flood hazard zon
    ing in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision
    analysis. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 7(3):1000–1017. https://
    doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1045043
  55. Choudhury S, Basak A, Biswas S, Das J (2022) Flash Flood sus
    ceptibility mapping using GIS-Based AHP method. In: Pradhan
    B, Shit PK, Bhunia GS, Adhikary PP, Pourghasemi HR (eds) Spatial
    modelling of Flood Risk and Flood Hazards. GIScience and Geo
    environmental modelling. Springer, Cham. https:// doi. org/ 10.
    1007/978-3-030-94544-2_8
  56. Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP (2011) Flood management and a GIS
    modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas—a case study.
    Hydrol Sci J–J des Sci Hydrol 56(2):212–225. https://doi.org/10.
    1080/02626667.2011.555836
  57. Mahmoud SH, Gan TY (2018) Multi-criteria approach to develop
    f
    lood susceptibility maps in arid regions of Middle East. J Clean
    Prod 196:216–229. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2018. 06. 047
  58. Poddar I, Alam J, Basak A, Mitra R, Das J (2023) Application of
    a geospatial-based subjective MCDM Method for Flood sus
    ceptibility modeling in Teesta River Basin, West Bengal, India.
    Monitoring and managing multi-hazards. Springer, Cham, pp
    135–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15377-8_10
  59. Adnan MSG, Dewan A, Zannat KE, Abdullah AYM (2019) The
    use of watershed geomorphic data in flash flood susceptibility
    zoning: a case study of the Karnaphuli and Sangu river basins
    of Bangladesh. Nat Hazards 99(1):425–448. https:// doi. org/ 10.
    1007/s11069-019-03749-3
  60. Bora SL, Das J, Bhuyan K, Hazarika PJ (2023) Flood susceptibil
    ity mapping using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis in
    Dibrugarh District of Assam, North-East India. Monitoring and
    managing multi-hazards. Springer, Cham, pp 65–79. https:// doi.
    org/10.1007/978-3-031-15377-8_4
  61. Muchiri PW (2008) Evaluation of the performance of the United
    States Geological Survey (USGS) Stream Flow Model on the Sha
    belle River Basin in Somalia (Doctoral dissertation, University of
    Nairobi, Kenya)
  62. Thiemig V, Pappenberger F, Thielen J, Gadain H, De Roo A, Bodis
    K et al (2010) Ensemble flood forecasting in Africa: a feasibil
    ity study in the Juba-Shabelle river basin. Atmosph Sci Lett
    11(2):123–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.26

Leave a Reply

Scroll to Top

Discover more from Geographic Book

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading